may be widely available. However, tests with a better
performance are necessary. Positive screening results
must be carefully confirmed by serological tests and
follow-up, particularly in asymptomatic children.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This research was supported by FAPESP (Fundac¸ a
˜
o
de Amparo a
`
Pesquisa do Estado de Sa
˜
o Paulo). We
are grateful to the staff of the Neonatal Service of
Hospital das Clı
´
nicas da Faculdade de Medicina de
Ribeira
˜
o Preto da Universidade de Sa
˜
o Paulo.
REFERENCES
1. Remington JS, McLeod R, Desmonts G, Thulliez P.
Toxoplasmosis. In : Remington JS, Klein JO, eds.
Infectious diseases of the fetus and newborn infant, 5th
edn. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2001 : 205–346.
2. Guerina NG, Hsu HW, Meissner C, et al. Neonatal
serologic screening and early treatment for congenital
Toxoplasma gondii infection. N Engl J Med 1994; 330 :
1858–1863.
3. Wilson CB, Remington JS, Stagno S, Reynolds DW.
Development of adverse sequelae in children born with
subclinical congenital Toxoplasma infection. Pediatrics
1980; 66 : 767–774.
4. Koppe J, Loewer-Sieger DH, DeRoever-Bonnet H.
Results of 20-year follow-up of congenital toxo-
plasmosis. Lancet 1986 ; 1 : 254–256.
5. McAuley J, Boyer KM, Patel D, et al. Early and longi-
tudinal evaluations of treated infants and children and
untreated historical patients with congenital toxo-
plasmosis: the Chicago Collaborative Treatment Trial.
Clin Infect Dis 1994 ; 18 : 38–72.
6. Sze
´
na
´
si Z, Ozsva
´
r Z, Nagy E, et al. Prevention of
congenital toxoplasmosis in Szeged, Hungary. Int J
Epidemiol 1997 ; 26 : 428–435.
7. Jenum PA, Stray-Pedersen B, Melby KK, et al.
Incidence of Toxoplasma gondii infection in 35,940
pregnant women in Norway and pregnancy outcome
for infected women. J Clin Microbiol 1998 ; 36 : 2900–
2906.
8. Ambroise-Thomas P, Schweitzer M, Pinon JM,
Thiebaugeorges O. Prevention of congenital toxo-
plasmosis in France. Risk assessment. Results and per-
spectives of prenatal screening and newborn follow up
[in French]. Bull Acad Natl Me
´
d 2001; 183: 665–683.
9. Lebech M, Andersen O, Christensen NC, et al.
Feasibility of neonatal screening for toxoplasma infec-
tion in the absence of prenatal treatment. Lancet 1999 ;
353: 1834–1837.
10. Evenga
˚
rd B, Petersson K, Engman ML, et al. Low
incidence of toxoplasma infection during pregnancy
and in newborns in Sweden. Epidemiol Infect 2001;
127: 121–127.
11. Logar J, Petrovec M, Novak-Antolic
ˇ
Z
ˇ
, et al. Prevention
of congenital toxoplasmosis in Slovenia by serological
screening of pregnant women. Scand J Infect Dis 2002;
34: 201–204.
12. Duarte G, Paschoini MC, Martinez R, Ramos DM,
Turco F. Seroepidemiological evaluation of toxo-
plasmosis in puerperae [in Portuguese]. Rev Bras Ginec
Obstet 1999; 21 : 175.
13. Rey LC, Ramalho ILC. Seroprevalence of toxo-
plasmosis in Fortaleza, Ceara
`
, Brazil [in Portuguese].
Rev Inst Med Trop S Paulo 1999; 41 : 171–174.
14. Reiche EMV, Morimoto HK, Farias GN, et al.
Prevalence of American trypanosomiasis, syphilis,
toxoplasmosis, rubella, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, human
immunodeficiency virus infection, assayed through
serological tests among pregnant patients, from 1996 to
1998, at the Regional University Hospital Norte do
Parana
´
[in Portuguese]. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2000;
33: 519–527.
15. Spalding SM, Amendoeira MRR, Ribeiro LC, Silveira
C, Garcia AP, Camillo-Coura L. Prospective study of
pregnants and babies with risk of congenital toxo-
plasmosis in municipal district of Rio Grande do Sul
[in Portuguese]. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2003 ; 36 :
483–491.
16. Varella IS, Wagner MB, Darela AC, Nunes LM, Muller
RW. Seroprevalence of toxoplasmosis in pregnant
women [in Portuguese]. J Pediatr (Rio J) 2003 ; 79:
69–74.
17. Camargo Neto E, Anele E, Rubim R, et al. High preva-
lence of congenital toxoplasmosis in Brazil estimated in
a 3-year prospective neonatal screening study. Int J
Epidemiol 2000 ; 29 : 941–947.
18. Petersen E, Pollak A, Reiter-Owona I. Recent trends in
research on congenital toxoplasmosis. Int J Parasitol
2001; 31 : 115–144.
19. Mozzatto L, Procianoy RS. Incidence of congenital
toxoplasmosis in southern Brazil : a prospective study.
Rev Inst Med Trop S Paulo 2003; 45 : 147–151.
20. Lebech M, Johnson DHM, Seitz HM, et al. Classi-
fication system and case definitions of Toxoplasma
gondii infection in immunocompetent pregnant women
and their congenitally infected offspring. Eur J Clin
Microbiol Infect Dis 1996 ; 15 : 799–805.
21. Frenkel JK. Breaking the transmission chain of
Toxoplasma: a program for the prevention of human
toxoplasmosis. Bull NY Acad Sci 1974 ; 50 : 228–234.
22. Eaton RB, Petersen E, Seppa
¨
nen H, Tuuminen T.
Multicenter evaluation of a fluorometric enzyme im-
munocapture assay to detect Toxoplasma-specific
immunoglobulin M in dried blood filter paper speci-
mens from newborns. J Clin Microbiol 1996; 34 : 3147–
3150.
23. Yamamoto AY, Mussi-Pinhata MM, Pinto PC,
Figueiredo LT, Jorge SM. Usefulness of blood and
urine samples collected on filter paper in detecting
cytomegalovirus by the polymerase chain reaction
technique. J Virol Methods 2001; 97 : 159–164.
24. Paul M, Petersen E, Pawlowski ZS, Szczapa J.
Neonatal screening for congenital toxoplasmosis in the
490 C. G. Carvalheiro and others