Engaged Student Learning: Essays on Best Practices in the University System of Georgia Volume 1, 2019
http://www.usg.edu/facultydevelopment/
Example. Identifying when one concept is like another epitomizes analogical reasoning. For example, in
teaching a cell’s organizational boundaries in an introductory science class, a teacher might tender the
partial analogy: A cell membrane is like ________. If a student responds “an Oreo cookie,” the instructor
might then ask, “Why?” A viable answer might be that a cell membrane is like the phospholipid bilayer of
an Oreo cookie with cholesterol as the cream filling (Glynn, 1991). Again, be sure to encourage students to
uncover where the analog (Oreo cookie) evidences dissimilarities from the target (cell membrane).
Word association
Present the class with a term. Next, ask students to generate and justify other words that they associate with
this term.
Example. In this approach, students rely on concepts that they already understand (familiar) to clarify those
that they do not yet comprehend (unfamiliar). To exemplify, stream of consciousness is a term with teaching
implications across disciplines, including psychology, speech communication, and journalism. As originally
conceived (James, 1890/1950), this metaphorical expression highlights that human consciousness occurs
around the clock, even in altered states such as daydreaming, sleeping, and dreaming. In the framework of
a word-association task, students might submit stream-related words (e.g., flow, unending, unbroken) in
capturing the essence of this conception.
Contextualizing learning
Using the name of a well-known person relevant to course content, ask students to imagine that they actually
are that person in the conduct of his or her work. Probe students on how they might feel being that person
relative to this work.
Example. Consistent with bridging capabilities of analogical thinking, contextualizing learning occurs when
students process new information by making personalized sense of it in a particular context (e.g., from
another’s perspective or experiences). One way to accomplish this goal is for teachers in any academic
discipline to ask students to “put themselves in the shoes” of famous contributors whose work they plan to
cover. Before discussing a groundbreaking theory in a physics class, for instance, a teacher might pose the
following question to the class: “If you were Albert Einstein, how would you feel about working on the
theory of relativity?” Careful consideration in answering might help students to contextualize their
understanding of Einstein’s work, based on personal and sociohistorical overtones occurring during the time
that he proposed this theory. I have found that preceding this activity with a mini-biographical sketch of the
contributor’s life and times increases likelihood of success.
Student Feedback
At the conclusion of class in which I have used one of these activities, I assess students’ perceptions of
completing that activity with an anonymous 5-item questionnaire with rating anchors at 1 (not effective) and
5 (highly effective): (1) stimulating engagement in learning; (2) facilitating understanding of course content; (3)
increasing motivation to learn; (4) promoting intellectual challenge; and (5) fostering interest in the subject
matter. Students’ numerical ratings have been routinely positive in the 4-5 range on all surveyed items.
The questionnaire also includes an open-ended section marked Comments where students are invited to
respond narratively, as in this actual student excerpt: “Even though I already had a basic idea of what tabula
rasa was before today’s class, using the etch-a-sketch to discuss it was a great way to bring it to life.”
Despite the global success of these activities, one criticism voiced periodically by students is that even though
analogies can be helpful, they can also be confusing and misleading if pushed to an unsubstantiated extreme.
As a proactive measure to address this legitimate concern, it is important that teachers urge students to
discover where analogies fall short in terms of dissimilarities between familiar and unfamiliar conceptions
(Glynn, Law, & Doster, 1998).